State v. Michael Rowe Russo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming rape and kidnapping convictions and the admission of Rule 404(b) evidence because “the evidence of Defendant’s fantasies and his collecting pornography that was consistent with those fantasies was relevant to his motive in this case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).