Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/12/2005

State v. Hayes

Citations

121 P.3d 17
202 Or. App. 63
2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 1340

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that an appellant who was homeless and would not take diabetes medications could not be committed on basic needs ground because speculative risk of untreated diabetes was insufficient evidence of a near future threat
concluding that an appellant who was homeless and would not take diabetes medications could not be committed on basic needs ground because speculative risk of untreated diabetes was insufficient evidence of a near future threat
observing that “the record does not disclose probable, or even possible, consequences of that refusal and noncooperation”
requiring evidence of “the consequences that [the appellant] would likely suffer in the near future” if she failed to take her medication
noting lack of evidence about “the nature or severity of appellant’s diabetes”
risks from appellant acting in response to her auditory hallucinations were too attenuated and speculative to justify commitment on the ground that she was a danger to herself

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Brewer, Rosenblum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.