Skip to main content
· 10/18/1995

State v. Sea

Citations

  • 904 P.2d 182
  • 137 Or. App. 333
  • 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1460

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing “basic needs” commitment where evidence disclosed “no meaningful reference for the significance of the loss of ten pounds over a period of several months” and where there was “no evidence that appellant has failed to seek medical treatment when necessary”
  • “appellant is a generally self-sufficient individual, who, despite her mental illness, lives on her own, manages her own affairs, including paying her bills, is well groomed, and is generally well spoken”
  • “To be ‘clear and convincing,’ evidence must be of ‘extraordinary persuasiveness.’ ” (Citation omitted.)
  • “Basic needs are those things necessary to sustain life.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
  • appellant who was reluctant to go to grocery store and had lost ten pounds should not have been committed based on inability to meet basic needs because there was no evidence that weight loss had affected her health

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Deits, De Muniz Haselton, Haselton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.