Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2/20/2002

State v. Hitt

Citations

41 P.3d 434
179 Or. App. 563
2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 305

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reversing commitment based on danger to others where the risk of future dangerousness was speculative and abstract
addressing the scope of the evidentiary record in a commitment or recommitment proceeding, including that \[i]nitial commitment and further commitment are distinct proceedings\ and that \the record of the former is not automatically incorporated into the record of the latter\
in mental commitment proceedings, materials placed in the trial court file are not necessarily and automatically deemed incorporated into the evidentiary record of the proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Wollheim, Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.