Court of Appeals of Oregon· 12/13/2006
State v. Allen
Citations
- 149 P.3d 289
- 209 Or. App. 647
- 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1939
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The bare conclusion of an examiner, however, is not adequate to support commitment; an examiner’s conclusion must be supported by facts.”
- where the record reflected that the appellant pushed someone, but contained no details about the circumstances of the incident, the evidence “hardly established] a foundation for a prediction of future dangerousness”
- bare conclusion of examiner is insufficient to support commitment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Schuman, Ortega
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. S. R. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-10-19· cited 84×
- State v. A. D. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-08-14· cited 58×
- State v. M. J. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-09-16· cited 50×
- State v. M. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-02-11· cited 27×
- State v. L. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-29· cited 19×
- State v. A. M.-M.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-08-11· cited 15×
- State v. A. M. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-07-07· cited 11×
- State v. N. A. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-12-05· cited 7×
- State v. K. L.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-06-25· cited 7×
- State v. F. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-24· cited 7×
- State v. L. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-05-30· cited 4×
- State v. D. A. H.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-03-09· cited 4×
- State v. K. K. G.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-11-26· cited 3×
- Brown v. MacDonald & Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-12-26· cited 2×
- State v. AM-M.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-08-11
- State v. LDCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-29
- State v. FCCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-24
- State v. DAHCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-03-09
- State v. MRCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-02-11
- State v. KLCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-06-25
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Matter of LucasCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-12-05· cited 46×
- State v. AyalaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-12-15· cited 39×
- State v. OlsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-10-18· cited 27×
- State v. LottCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-10-26· cited 26×
- State v. HambletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-11-16· cited 21×
- State v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-10-12· cited 21×
- State v. SeaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-10-18· cited 20×
- State v. HittCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-02-20· cited 20×
- State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-12-23· cited 17×
- State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-11-14· cited 13×
- State v. JuddCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-05-17· cited 10×
- State v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-02-01· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.