Skip to main content
· 4/25/2001

State v. Jayne

Citations

  • 24 P.3d 920
  • 173 Or. App. 533
  • 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 583

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that in that case the “defendant did not argue, and the trial court did not find, that the [urinalysis] evidence was so lacking in foundation that it was inadmissible per se under OEC 702”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Wollheim, Ceniceros

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.