Skip to main content

State v. Doak

Citations

  • 243 P.3d 70
  • 349 Or. 171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that dismissal was not required where entire 13-month delay attributable to state was reasonably explained
  • whether historical facts amount to consent to a particular delay for purposes of ORS 135.747 is reviewed as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.