Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a justiciable controversy exists if (1) parties’ interests are adverse and (2) court’s decision in matter will have some practical effect on rights of the parties
• holding that a case is not moot if a decision “in the matter will have some practical effect on the rights of the parties to the controversy”
• stating that case is moot if decision will no longer have a practical effect on or concerning rights of parties
• explaining that case is moot if court’s decision “no longer will have a practical effect on or concerning the rights of the parties”
• noting that cases “in which a court’s decision no longer will have a practical effect on or concern- ing the rights of the parties, will be dismissed as moot”
• noting that cases “in which a court’s decision no longer will have a practical effect on or concern- ing the rights of the parties, will be dismissed as moot”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).