Tennessee Supreme Court· 5/4/2010

State v. Hatcher

Citations

310 S.W.3d 788
2010 Tenn. LEXIS 419
2010 WL 1780049

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the time for filing a motion for a new trial runs from the time the uniform judgment order is entered
holding that proof supporting conviction for murder was so overwhelming that “error in the jury instructions and the prosecution‟s error during closing argument were not so prejudicial that they probably changed the outcome of the trial”
stating that a defendant waives those issues not raised in a motion for new trial and those issues are subject to plain error review
stating that a defendant waives those issues not raised in a motion for new trial and those issues are subject to plain error review
stating that a defendant waives those issues not raised in a motion for new trial and those issues are subject to plain error review
stating that a defendant waives those issues not raised in a motion for new trial and those issues are subject to plain error review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justice Cornelia A. Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

225 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Hatcher

61 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.