Skip to main content

State v. Hatcher

Citations

  • 708 S.E.2d 750
  • 392 S.C. 86
  • 2011 S.C. LEXIS 50

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a party offering fungible items, such as drugs or blood samples, into evidence must establish a complete chain of custody as far as practicable
  • holding establishment of a chain of custody was not necessary since the audiotaped conversation was otherwise authenticated under Rule 901, SCRE
  • holding that although “every person handling the evidence need not be identified in all cases,” the proponent of the evidence must nonetheless demonstrate “how the item was obtained and how it was handled to ensure that it is, in fact, what it is purported to be”
  • stating a party offering fungible items, such as drugs or blood samples, into evidence must establish a complete chain of custody as far as practicable
  • finding the State need not establish the identity of every person handling evidence items in all circumstances, but rather the appropriate standard is whether, in the discretion of the trial judge, the State has established the chain of custody as far as practicable
  • \The ultimate goal of chain of custody requirements is simply to ensure that the item is what it is purported to be.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beatty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.