State v. Hatcher

Citations

• 2023 Ohio 3884

Syllabus

Felony sentencing appellate review R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) clearly and convincingly finds sentence contrary to law principles and purposes of sentencing R.C. 2929.11 R.C. 2929.12 mitigating factors genuine remorse ineffective assistance of counsel deficiency prejudice plea bargain waiver knowing, intelligent, and voluntary plea. Appellant failed to demonstrate that the trial court did not properly consider the sentencing factors or that his sentence was contrary to law. The record reflects that the court spent significant time going through R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12, addressing all of the factors listed therein, and his six-month sentence was within the statutory range. Appellant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel. Appellant failed to cite any portion of the record showing where his counsel's performance fell below a reasonable standard and did not demonstrate that his plea was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made.