Tennessee Supreme Court· 3/17/1997

State v. Martin

Citations

940 S.W.2d 567
1997 Tenn. LEXIS 131
1997 WL 117293

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a defendant relinquishes the right to argue on appeal any issues that should have been presented in a motion for new trial
holding that a defendant relinquishes the right to argue on appeal any issues that should have been presented in a motion for new trial
holding that a defendant relinquishes the right to argue on appeal any issues that should have been presented in a motion for new trial
holding that a defendant relinquishes the right to argue on appeal any issues that should have been presented in a motion for new trial
holding that a defendant relinquishes the right to argue on appeal any issues that should have been presented in a motion for new trial
holding that a defendant relinquishes the right to argue on appeal any issues that should have been presented in a motion for new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Drowota, Reid, Todd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

230 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.