Tennessee Supreme Court· 1/26/2006

Wiley v. State

Citations

183 S.W.3d 317
2006 Tenn. LEXIS 20
2006 WL 177254

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding in post-conviction proceeding that its decisions in State v. Burns, 6 S.W.3d 453 (Tenn. 1999), and State v. Ely, 48 S.W.3d 710 (Tenn. 2001
evaluating a petitioner’s post- conviction claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in failing to request lesser-included offense instructions by reviewing counsel’s actions in light of the law of lesser-included offenses as it existed at the time of the trial
evaluating a petitioner’s post-conviction claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in failing to request lesser included offense instructions by reviewing counsel’s actions in light of the law of lesser included offenses as it existed at the time of the trial
“At no point did the petitioner assert that he lacked intent or that he did not recall the events due to his level of impairment. The petitioner also introduced no evidence during post-conviction that would have supported this defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justice E. Riley Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

253 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.