Supreme Court of Kansas· 4/19/1996

State v. Harris

Citations

259 Kan. 689
915 P.2d 758
1996 Kan. LEXIS 72

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that certain autopsy photographs of the victim’s wounds were admissible because the photographs did not make the wounds look any more gruesome tiran they otherwise would have; the photographs accurately depicted the victim’s injuries
affirming convictions of first-degree murder and aggravated battery against a law enforcement officer
notice filed in afternoon after arraignment was concluded, contained no further notations; record showed State filed notice with court and with defendant simultaneously; notice proper
statement used circumstantially to give rise to an indirect inference rather than for its truth is not hearsay
the State indicated an intent to file a notice with the court, but the State cited the incorrect statute number; this court found the notice was still properly filed with the court
purpose of statute requiring State to provide notice of intent to seek hard-40 sentence is to make defendant aware of hard-40 prospect so as to be in a position to devise his or her strategy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.