Supreme Court of Kansas· 1/27/1995

State v. Brinkley

Citations

256 Kan. 808
888 P.2d 819
1995 Kan. LEXIS 8

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

declining to address an evidentiary challenge raised for the first time in a posttrial motion for a new trial
declining to address an evidentiaiy challenge raised for the first time in a post-trial motion for a new trial
declining to address an evidentiary challenge raised for the first time in a post-trial motion for new trial
aiding and abetting instruction not error if there is sufficient evidence to support the instruction, even though the only evidence supporting the aiding and abetting theory is circumstantial
\A 6 motion for new trial generally does not satisfy the contemporaneous objection requirement of K.S.A. 60-404.\
defendant initially refused to speak to police on advice of counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Six

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.