State v. Papadakis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that convicting the defendant of multiple controlled substance crimes, each conviction for a different controlled substance, was proper
• holding that a motion to reopen an omnibus hearing is within the district court’s discretion, and its decision to deny appellant’s motion was not in error in that case
• finding that spoon with burn marks and plastic bag containing cocaine residue were sufficient to establish probable cause for search
• imposing seven fifth degree controlled substance convictions for possession of hashish and six different kinds of steroids
• acknowledging district court's authority to consider motions to reconsider and stating that a motion to reconsider \may be the most efficient and preferable course of action\ because it can spare parties the time and expense of appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).