Supreme Court of Minnesota· 3/16/1973
State v. Wiley
Citations
- 205 N.W.2d 667
- 295 Minn. 411
- 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1319
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding drugs in the place where the defendant either lived or spent a lot of time
- affirming a conviction for possession of marijuana when the police investigation was initiated based on a housing inspector informing police that he saw marijuana in the defendant’s garage
- “In passing on an application for a warrant, the magistrate is not required to ignore such familiar facts of normal life as the habit of most people to have items of identification at their residence.”
- drawer where the drugs were found contained items displaying the defendant’s name
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Todd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Paul v. OatesSecond Circuit· 1977-06-03· cited 472×
- State v. FlorineSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-02-07· cited 117×
- State v. YangSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-10-29· cited 85×
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-01-07· cited 76×
- State v. WellnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-04-21· cited 50×
- State v. BerkelmanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-09-21· cited 49×
- State v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-07-06· cited 44×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-05-03· cited 44×
- State v. MollbergSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-10-01· cited 42×
- State v. YarbroughSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-01-08· cited 38×
- State v. YaritzSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-10-12· cited 37×
- Rosillo v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-04-13· cited 31×
- State v. NoltingSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-04-01· cited 30×
- State v. LuciowSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-03-26· cited 29×
- State, Village of New Hope v. Eric DuplessieSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-06-27· cited 24×
- State of Minnesota v. Dominic Jason Allen SamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2015-02-17· cited 24×
- State v. KealohaHawaii Supreme Court· 1980-06-23· cited 22×
- State v. RothmanHawaii Supreme Court· 1989-08-10· cited 21×
- State v. DenisonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-04-04· cited 16×
- State v. RambahalSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-06-19· cited 16×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-03-25· cited 3,599×
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 3,217×
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court· 1968-04-29· cited 1,846×
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1971-06-28· cited 1,806×
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1967-04-24· cited 1,521×
- Stanford v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 948×
- Marcus v. Search Warrant of PropertySupreme Court· 1961-06-19· cited 752×
- Sims v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1967-01-23· cited 561×
- United States v. Charles T. Bennett, Wilbert Haywood, Elmer Jessup, Henry Stanton and Farris ThomasSecond Circuit· 1969-02-26· cited 244×
- State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-12-10· cited 119×
- State Ex Rel. Trimble v. HedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-11-26· cited 49×
- State v. BillingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1954-03-19· cited 36×
- State v. MatousekSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1970-06-19· cited 36×
- State v. LaBarreSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1972-02-04· cited 33×
- State Ex Rel. Duhn v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1966-12-16· cited 31×
- State v. BagleySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1970-02-20· cited 30×
- State v. PurdySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-09-22· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.