State v. Hargett
Citations
- 196 Conn. App. 228
Syllabus
Convicted of the crime of murder in connection with the shooting death of the victim, the defendant appealed. He claimed that the trial court vio- lated his right to present a defense when it excluded certain evidence of an alleged statement made by a bystander and an autopsy toxicology report, violated his right to due process when it declined to give a jury instruction on self-defense, improperly admitted firearm related evidence including, inter alia, reports by a state firearms expert, R, and violated his right to a fair trial when it failed to grant his motions for sanctions, for a new trial or to dismiss the charges after the state's late disclosure of the firearms related evidence. He further claimed that he was denied the right to a fair trial due to prosecutorial impropriety. Held: 1. The trial court did not abuse its discretion or violate the defendant's right to present a defense by excluding evidence of a statement allegedly made by an unidentified bystander and the toxicology portion of the victim's autopsy report. a. The defendant failed to demonstrate the relevancy to his claim of self-defense or to lay an evidentiary foundation for the unidentified bystander's alleged statement; the defendant failed to lay the foundation necessary to admit the alleged statement as relevant to his state of mind, in that he failed to offer any testimony that the alleged statement influenced his assessment of the need to use deadly physical force against the victim and, as there was no evidence that the defendant heard the alleged statement, it was irrelevant to his motive. b. The trial court properly excluded the toxicology report from evidence: there was no causal relationship between the victim having PCP in his body and the defendant having shot him; moreover, at trial, the defendant failed to explain why the presence of PCP in the victim was relevant to his claim of self-defense or his intent and there was no evidence that the defendant feared the victim or that th
Judges: Lavine; Elgo; Moll
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-07-28· cited 498×
- Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-05-20· cited 268×
- State v. FauciSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-04-10· cited 161×
- State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-10-12· cited 157×
- State v. FritzSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-06-23· cited 98×
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-08-04· cited 93×
- State v. FestoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-06-24· cited 76×
- State v. EspositoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-08-04· cited 74×
- State v. AliSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-06-06· cited 72×
- State v. CerretaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-05-21· cited 67×
- Howard v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1992-10-19· cited 67×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-05-05· cited 66×
- State v. CowardSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-06-30· cited 63×
- State v. CopelandSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-09-01· cited 54×
- State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-09-12· cited 53×
- State v. RespassSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-05-15· cited 52×
- Commonwealth v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2004-08-19· cited 50×
- Galle v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court· 2001-10-29· cited 48×
- State v. PaulingConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-07-17· cited 34×
- State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-05-13· cited 31×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.