Supreme Court of Connecticut· 9/12/1978
State v. Miranda
Citations
- 176 Conn. 107
- 405 A.2d 622
- 1978 Conn. LEXIS 1013
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that specific acts of violence introduced as evidence of victim’s character have “the potential to surprise, to arouse prejudice, to multiply the issues and confuse the jury, and to prolong the trial”
- permitting, for first time, victim’s convictions for violent crimes to be used to prove character and declining to carve similar exception for proof by specific acts
- although trial court applied legal standard in effect at time of trial, change of law on appeal necessitates reversal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bogdanski, Loiselle, Longo, Peters, Speziale
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. LynchIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-10-19· cited 264×
- State v. MasonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-03-30· cited 121×
- State v. GoochSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-01-05· cited 117×
- State v. FurloughCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1990-04-10· cited 112×
- State v. SawyerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-08-08· cited 94×
- State v. RamosSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-07-30· cited 81×
- Commonwealth v. AdjutantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-03-14· cited 78×
- State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-09-04· cited 75×
- State v. BemberSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-04-07· cited 69×
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-02-01· cited 69×
- Johns v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-08-17· cited 67×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-05-05· cited 66×
- State v. ShabazzSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-09-08· cited 63×
- State v. HedgeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-08-03· cited 62×
- State v. WhitfordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-07-02· cited 59×
- State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-06-11· cited 49×
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1992-08-31· cited 45×
- Shabazz v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-03-26· cited 40×
- State v. TribbleSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1981-04-29· cited 32×
- State v. MaxwellConnecticut Appellate Court· 1992-12-15· cited 28×
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals· 1976-05-11· cited 193×
- Commonwealth v. AmosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-12-20· cited 111×
- Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1975-09-02· cited 106×
- Dempsey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1954-04-07· cited 98×
- United States v. James H. BurksD.C. Circuit· 1972-10-19· cited 94×
- Guss Maggitt v. Donald Wyrick, Warden, Missouri State PenitentiaryEighth Circuit· 1976-04-07· cited 81×
- State v. TropianoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1969-09-24· cited 77×
- State v. JacobySupreme Court of Iowa· 1977-12-21· cited 76×
- State v. TownsendSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-02-04· cited 54×
- Mattie M. Evans v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1960-03-31· cited 51×
- State v. InfantolinoSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1976-04-23· cited 51×
- State v. BlakeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1968-10-23· cited 46×
- State v. ConyersSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1971-03-26· cited 46×
- State v. GriffinArizona Supreme Court· 1965-10-08· cited 45×
- United States v. AkersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1977-06-02· cited 45×
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-02-03· cited 41×
- Stover v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1971-04-26· cited 31×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1952-07-01· cited 29×
- State v. AlderetteNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-07-03· cited 29×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-09-23· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.