Skip to main content

State v. Miranda

Citations

  • 176 Conn. 107
  • 405 A.2d 622
  • 1978 Conn. LEXIS 1013

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that specific acts of violence introduced as evidence of victim’s character have “the potential to surprise, to arouse prejudice, to multiply the issues and confuse the jury, and to prolong the trial”
  • permitting, for first time, victim’s convictions for violent crimes to be used to prove character and declining to carve similar exception for proof by specific acts
  • although trial court applied legal standard in effect at time of trial, change of law on appeal necessitates reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bogdanski, Loiselle, Longo, Peters, Speziale

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.