Supreme Court of Connecticut· 6/23/1987
State v. Fritz
Citations
- 204 Conn. 156
- 527 A.2d 1157
- 1987 Conn. LEXIS 912
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to adopt per se rule that limiting defense counsel’s questioning of prospective juror about testi- mony of police officer was reversible error and engaging in harmless error analysis
- when important testimony from police officers is anticipated, such that a juror might reasonably be more, or less, inclined to credit their testimony, questions concerning whether a juror would have such an inclination are proper during voir dire
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Callahan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Walczyk v. RioSecond Circuit· 2007-08-01· cited 426×
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-07-07· cited 301×
- Jackson v. R. G. Whipple, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-06-08· cited 274×
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-08-20· cited 257×
- People v. GatesMichigan Supreme Court· 1990-03-05· cited 210×
- State v. BoscarinoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-08-11· cited 186×
- State v. Tippetts-Abbett-McCarthy-StrattonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-06-23· cited 145×
- Mazziotti v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-05-13· cited 145×
- Phillips v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-08-13· cited 128×
- State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-07-14· cited 122×
- State v. BrabsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-09-30· cited 109×
- Hall v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-01-23· cited 106×
- State v. AlvarezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-08-21· cited 95×
- Reynolds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-09-15· cited 92×
- State v. JolySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-06-18· cited 78×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-05-05· cited 66×
- Town of Voluntown v. RytmanConnecticut Appellate Court· 1990-04-17· cited 66×
- State v. AvisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-12-06· cited 60×
- State v. OehmanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-08-01· cited 58×
- State v. MercerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-06-21· cited 55×
Cites
54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court· 1985-04-29· cited 2,053×
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 1,352×
- Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court· 1940-05-20· cited 802×
- Connecticut v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1983-02-23· cited 606×
- People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-09-27· cited 364×
- Textile Workers Union v. Kayser-Roth Corp.Supreme Court· 1973-10-23· cited 355×
- State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-06-19· cited 212×
- McManues v. OverbergSupreme Court· 1979-10-29· cited 210×
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-09-10· cited 192×
- Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1972-07-05· cited 186×
- State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-04-16· cited 175×
- State v. MoynahanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-04-05· cited 159×
- State v. TaltonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-08-27· cited 140×
- Kennedy v. Bureau of Narcotics & Dangerous Drugs, United States Department of JusticeSupreme Court· 1973-01-08· cited 130×
- State v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-09-21· cited 107×
- State v. MastropetreSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-08-01· cited 100×
- State v. BoucinoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-03-18· cited 92×
- Hartford Division, Emhart Industries, Inc. v. Amalgamated Local Union 376Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-06-14· cited 84×
- Slattery v. MaykutSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-09-19· cited 81×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.