In Re the Welfare of B.R.K.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that short-term social guests have a reasonable expectation of privacy in a home under Article I, Section 10, though there is no such expectation under the Fourth Amendment
• holding, in the absence of Supreme Court precedent, that short-term social guests have a reasonable expectation of privacy under Article I, Section 10
• holding, in the absence of Supreme Court precedent, that short-term social guests have a reasonable expectation of privacy under Article I, Section 10
• legitimate expectation of privacy under Section 10 for short-term social guests, even if not under Fourth Amendment
• violation of the Fourth Amendment and Minnesota Constitution Article I, Section 10, requires that “the fruits of the [warrantless] entry and search must be suppressed”
• non-overnight guests with “social nexus” to owner may enjoy reasonable expectation of privacy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).