In Re the Welfare of E.D.J.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[p]olice officer’s directive to person to stop constituted a ‘seizure’ of the person under Minn. Const. art. I, § 10”
• concluding that there clearly was a seizure once the police directed the defendant to stop
• holding that the pre- Hodari D. reasonable person test applies when determining whether a seizure has occurred under the Minnesota constitution
• holding that to justify a seizure police must articulate reasonable suspicion
• concluding that a seizure occurred when police directed E.D.J. to stop
• stating that one factor indicating a seizure has occurred is “the display of a weapon by an officer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).