Supreme Court of Minnesota· 8/8/1996

State v. Wynne

Citations

552 N.W.2d 218
1996 Minn. LEXIS 506
1996 WL 445135

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that a purse carried by a person is protected from search under a premises warrant because it is an extension of the person
holding that the search of a purse seized from a woman who arrived at her mother’s house when police were executing a search warrant was not encompassed by the scope of the warrant
holding that officers could not search the purse of a woman who arrived home while officers were executing a search warrant for the premises; the purse was considered part of that woman's person and she wasn't named in the search warrant
“A search warrant authorizing the search of a particular building or premises does not give the officers the right to search all persons who may be found in it.” (quotation omitted)
indicating the defendant had a privacy interest in her purse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tomljanovich, Anderson, Coyne, Stringer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.