Arizona Supreme Court· 8/4/1988

State v. Ault

Citations

759 P.2d 1320
157 Ariz. 516
14 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
1988 Ariz. LEXIS 135

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

determining whether an offense is a “serious offense” is a question for the judge
“when the legislature expresses a list, we assume the exclusion of items not listed”
“[W]hen the legislature expresses a list, we assume the exclusion of items not listed.”
when legislature expresses list, generally we assume exclusion of items not listed
“Because the legislature obviously knew how to require a jury finding when that was its intention and did not make such a provision here, we conclude that the legislature did not intend for seriousness to require a separate finding by the trier of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon, Feldman, Cameron, Holohan, Moeller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.