United States v. Jean Joseph Deeb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• admitting the transcribed testimony of a unavailable witness because “the objectives of at least one of the codefendants were sufficiently similar to [the defendant’s] that his cross-examination could and did probe [the witness’s] motive or inducement to lie.”
• “[T]he mere fact that a statement is made under oath is not enough to guarantee its trustworthiness.”
• “[T]he mere fact that a statement is made under oath is not enough to guarantee its trustworthiness.”
• allowing similar evidence to be admitted despite the Confrontation Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).