Skip to main content

Watkins v. State

Citations

  • 320 Ga. 862

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, under plain-error review, “[t]he current law considered is the law at the time of appellate review rather than at trial”
  • concluding that the 2 appellant forfeited his ineffectiveness claim because he failed to raise it in his amended motions for new trial, even though he was no longer represented by trial counsel, and the trial court did not rule on such a claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.