Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 10/30/2002

State v. Gross

Citations

  • 97 Ohio St. 3d 121
  • 2002 Ohio 5524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “[i]f sufficient untainted evidence is present in the warrant affidavit to establish probable cause, the warrant is valid”
  • “after excising tainted information from a supporting affidavit, ‘if sufficient untainted evidence was presented in the warrant affidavit to establish probable cause, the warrant was nevertheless valid’”
  • “after excising tainted information from a supporting affidavit, ‘if sufficient untainted evidence was presented in the warrant affidavit to establish probable cause, the warrant was nevertheless valid’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Only, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

123 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

108 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Gross

110 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.