Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 10/12/2000
State v. Gross
Citations
- 760 A.2d 725
- 134 Md. App. 528
- 2000 Md. App. LEXIS 171
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that DNA PCR evidence not covered by statute and requiring the evidence be subjected to the inquiry outlined in Reed
- holding that “the failure to anticipate a possible change in the local law of evidence or to push for such a change is not an instance of counsel’s representation [falling] below an objective standard of reasonableness.”
- admonishing that persuasive federal law may be looked to, but not necessarily to the exclusion of independent judgment and analysis by Maryland courts
- admonishing that persuasive federal law may be looked to, but not necessarily to the exclusion of independent judgment and analysis by Maryland courts
- holding that the appropriate relief for ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is the “awarding of a belated or new appeal,” noting that the relief “should be tailored to fit the deficiency” (quotation marks and citation omitted)
- “[C]ounsel is under no duty to anticipate a change in the case law” because trial counsel’s performance is judged “upon the situation as it existed at the time of trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moylan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Haas v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-01-09· cited 143×
- United States v. HornD. Maryland· 2002-01-31· cited 53×
- State v. JonesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-04-26· cited 38×
- Wagner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-01-03· cited 29×
- Kulbicki v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-08-27· cited 18×
- State v. PetersonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-09-13· cited 15×
- Perry v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-11-07· cited 11×
- Schmitt v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-08-31· cited 10×
- Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2023-08-31· cited 6×
- Villados v. State.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2020-12-09· cited 5×
- State v. DavisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-01-28· cited 5×
- Evans v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-25· cited 4×
- Otts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-09-13· cited 3×
- Muti v. University of Maryland Medical Systems Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-02-04· cited 3×
- State v. LathamCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-29· cited 2×
- Gantt v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-06-04· cited 1×
- Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2023-09-12
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.