State v. Green

Citations

• 2020 Ohio 5206

Syllabus

Appellant was convicted of aggravated burglary. The trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion to suppress the eyewitness identification. Appellant's conviction was based on sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The detective's comments that appellant was a suspect in other daytime burglaries did not deprive him of a fair trial we presume the jury followed the trial court's instructions to disregard those statements. The trial court did not err in failing to give an instruction on alibi. No cumulative error exists. We presume the trial court considered the appropriate sentencing factors in imposing a ten-year sentence. Judgment affirmed.