State v. Cherry

Citations

• 2024 Ohio 5344

Syllabus

Defense counsel was not ineffective in failing to file a motion to suppress appellant's post-arrest interview or to object to the State's characterization of Cherry as a drug dealer at sentencing. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting recordings of jail phone calls as admissions of a party-opponent or in admitting statements of the victim and other witnesses under exceptions to the hearsay rule. Sufficient evidence supported appellant's convictions, and his sentence is not contrary to law. Judgment affirmed.