Skip to main content

State v. Donald

Citations

  • 157 A.3d 1134
  • 325 Conn. 346
  • 2017 WL 1476173
  • 2017 Conn. LEXIS 108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging that Seib- ert was ‘‘plurality’’ opinion but nonetheless adopting its analysis to assess admissibility of second warned con- fession
  • acknowledging that Seib- ert was ‘‘plurality’’ opinion but nonetheless adopting its analysis to assess admissibility of second warned confession
  • \[w]hen the facts underlying a claim on appeal are not in dispute ... that claim is subject to de novo review\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • ‘‘[w]hen the facts underlying a claim on appeal are not in dispute . . . that claim is subject to de novo review’’ (internal quota- tion marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Palmer, Eveleigh, McDonald, Espinosa, Robinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.