State v. Waters
Citations
- 214 Conn. App. 294
Syllabus
Convicted, after a jury trial, of the crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and, under a part B information, on a plea of guilty, of being a second time offender pursuant to statute (§ 14-227a (g) (2)), the defendant appealed to this court. The defendant had attempted to make a U-turn when the car he was driving twice struck a car being driven by A. The defendant drove away from the accident scene and went home, where he claimed to have consumed a significant amount of alcohol and smoked a ''spliff.'' When the defendant reappeared at the scene on foot about twenty minutes later, A identified him as the driver of the other car. Police officers noticed that he was acting aggressively, slurring his speech and moving unsteadily. The defendant thereafter failed three sobriety tests the police administered to him and was taken to the police station where he was questioned after being advised of his rights pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona (384 U.S. 436). The defendant was charged under subdivision (1) of § 14- 227a (a), the behavioral subdivision, pursuant to which blood alcohol levels generally are excluded from evidence without a defendant's con- sent, in accordance with § 14-227a (c). The defendant testified on his own behalf, including testifying that he had not begun to consume alcohol until after he returned home after the incident with A. The state offered as rebuttal evidence the testimony of its expert witness, L, a forensic toxicologist. L testified in response to a set of hypothetical facts about the amount of time it typically takes for alcohol to have observable effects on an individual's motor functions and typical behav- ior associated with certain blood alcohol levels. The court overruled the defendant's objection to L's testimony. On appeal, the defendant claimed, inter alia, that L's testimony was tantamount to testimony about the defendant's blood alcohol content and, thus, violated the prohibition of such tes
Judges: Prescott; Alexander; Clark
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-05-20· cited 268×
- State v. FERNANDO A.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-11-03· cited 74×
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-11-25· cited 61×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-08-24· cited 57×
- State v. DeCosterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1960-07-12· cited 55×
- State v. DARRYL W.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-01-10· cited 45×
- State v. MorelliSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-08-18· cited 43×
- State v. ComminsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-12-20· cited 34×
- Rowe v. Superior Court, Judicial District of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-12-09· cited 32×
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-09-06· cited 30×
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-07-16· cited 28×
- State v. ForrestSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-08-07· cited 23×
- State v. CrespoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-01-31· cited 20×
- State v. HolleyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-07-19· cited 15×
- State v. ComminsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-06-22· cited 14×
- State v. Brett B.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2018-12-11· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.