Court of Appeals of Washington· 12/15/1982
State v. Goforth
Citations
- 655 P.2d 714
- 33 Wash. App. 405
- 1982 Wash. App. LEXIS 3392
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in passing on whether newly discovered evidence will probably result in a different outcome upon retrial, the trial court must necessarily pass upon the credibility, significance, and cogency of the proffered evidence
- evidence was sufficient to support inference that \gun was operable in fact\ where witnesses who were familiar with shotguns testified that the defendant used a real shotgun
- evidence was sufficient to support inference that \gun was operable in fact\ where witnesses who were familiar with shotguns testified that the defendant used a real shotgun
- in passing on whether newly discovered evidence will probably result in a different outcome upon retrial, the trial court must necessarily pass upon the credibility, significance, and cogency of the proffered evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Swanson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Keates v. City of VancouverCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-03-08· cited 46×
- State v. FaustCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-12-11· cited 31×
- State v. McKeeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-07-23· cited 28×
- State v. McKeeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-09-14· cited 21×
- State v. WestWashington Supreme Court· 1999-09-09· cited 14×
- State v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-07-03· cited 9×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court· 1980-08-28· cited 1,403×
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court· 1971-03-25· cited 1,211×
- United States v. James MillerSecond Circuit· 1969-03-14· cited 127×
- State v. TongateWashington Supreme Court· 1980-06-19· cited 81×
- State v. BarryCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1980-04-02· cited 50×
- State v. SlaughterWashington Supreme Court· 1967-03-30· cited 29×
- United States v. Otis Thurmond CurryFifth Circuit· 1974-07-15· cited 28×
- State v. FranksWashington Supreme Court· 1968-09-12· cited 28×
- State v. PeeleWashington Supreme Court· 1966-01-06· cited 26×
- Brandon v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1951-08-06· cited 18×
- United States v. Carson William Steel, Jr.Tenth Circuit· 1972-04-28· cited 18×
- State v. LetellierCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1977-01-10· cited 15×
- State v. GibsonWashington Supreme Court· 1969-01-09· cited 14×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1970-09-29· cited 10×
- United States v. MillerD. Connecticut· 1967-11-21· cited 9×
- State v. PamCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-10-26· cited 8×
- State v. RamelWashington Supreme Court· 1964-12-03· cited 5×
- United States v. Emil SchoepflinNinth Circuit· 1971-05-03· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.