Court of Appeals of Washington· 12/11/1998
State v. Faust
Citations
- 967 P.2d 1284
- 93 Wash. App. 373
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the definition of “firearm” is not limited “to only those guns capable of being fired during the commission of the crime”
- holding that the Tongate language Pam relied on did not limit the definition of a “firearm” to one capable of being fired during the crime. Rather, the distinction was between a toy gun and a gun “in fact” (emphasis added)
- holding that a malfunctioning firearm is a firearm for purposes of RCW 9.94A.310(3)(b) (the statute providing for a mandatory three-year sentencing enhancement for second degree assault where “the offender . . . was armed with a firearm as defined in RCW 9.41.010”)
- \eyewitness testimony to a real gun that is neither discharged nor recovered is sufficient to support deadly weapons and/or firearms penalty enhancements\
- language in Pam on operability refers to the difference between a toy gun and a gun in fact; a gun incapable of being fired due to a mechanical defect is still a firearm
- language in Pam on operability refers to the difference between a toy gun and a gun in fact; a gun incapable of being fired due to a mechanical defect is still a firearm
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GurskeWashington Supreme Court· 2005-08-25· cited 55×
- State v. RaleighCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-09-08· cited 54×
- State Of Washington, V. Jesse GouleyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-09-08· cited 44×
- State of Washington v. Dennis Wayne JussilaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2017-02-28· cited 34×
- State v. PadillaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-05-10· cited 19×
- State v. RelefordCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-02-02· cited 19×
- State v. BerrierCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-03-01· cited 18×
- State of Washington v. Christopher Michael Tasker, IICourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-04-28· cited 18×
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-02-16· cited 15×
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-05-01· cited 15×
- State Of Washington v. Michael S. OlsenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2019-10-08· cited 8×
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-09-30· cited 5×
- State v. HammockCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-02-23· cited 3×
- State v. HirschfelderCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-01-13· cited 3×
- State Of Washington v. Zyion Houston-Sconiers & Treson RobertsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-11-24
- State Of Washington v. Antonio Zamudio, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2016-02-04
- Marquez Vargas v. RRA CP Opportunity Tr. 1Washington Supreme Court· 2026-04-30
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 1988-07-14· cited 170×
- In Re the Marriage of GimlettWashington Supreme Court· 1981-06-11· cited 114×
- State v. PamWashington Supreme Court· 1983-02-10· cited 98×
- State v. TongateWashington Supreme Court· 1980-06-19· cited 81×
- State v. SunichCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-11-17· cited 33×
- Miller v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court· 1972-10-12· cited 32×
- State v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-03-05· cited 29×
- State v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-12-01· cited 26×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-08-07· cited 23×
- State v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-08-21· cited 19×
- Bernard v. BensonWashington Supreme Court· 1910-04-29· cited 19×
- State v. RahierCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-05-18· cited 15×
- State v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-03-04· cited 13×
- State v. GoforthCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1982-12-15· cited 10×
- State v. BeatonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-03-01· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.