Skip to main content

State v. Peele

Citations

  • 409 P.2d 663
  • 67 Wash. 2d 724
  • 1966 Wash. LEXIS 844

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to grant new trial based on trial court's determination that codefendant's testimony exculpating the defendant was not credible and unlikely to be believed by jury
  • refusing to grant new trial based on trial court’s determination that codefendant’s testimony exculpating the defendant was not credible and unlikely to be believed by jury
  • would not probably change the result of trial
  • uncorroborated affidavit from an accomplice purporting to exonerate a defendant should not result in a new trial 5 No. 78553-2-I/6 “unless it appears that the newly discovered evidence is of such significance and cogency that it will probably change the result of the trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hale

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.