Skip to main content
· 7/15/1974

United States v. Otis Thurmond Curry

Citations

  • 497 F.2d 99
  • 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7647

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • In fact, the State, in its Memorandum in support of its argument against granting defendant’s Motion, expressed the hope that an evidentiary hearing would not be necessary.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gewin, Godbold, Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.