Court of Appeals of Washington· 7/23/2007

State v. McKee

Citations

141 Wash. App. 22
167 P.3d 575

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[A]n offender’s constitutional rights during community placement are subject to SRA-authorized infringements, including crime-related prohibitions.”
“[A]n offender’s constitutional rights during community 22 No. 38697-0-III In re Pers. Restraint of Huezo placement are subject to SRA-authorized infringements, including crime-related prohibitions.”
exceptional concurrent sentencing found unjustified by the facts, but court did not question the multiple offense policy as a basis in a proper case
evidence was sufficient to supportfirearm enhancement given victim's description of the weight and feel of the gun, the way in which defendantwielded it, and evidence that defendant had a real gun and had access to other guns
evidence was sufficient to support firearm enhancement given victim's description of the weight and feel of the gun, the way in which defendant wielded it, and evidence that defendant had a real gun and access to other guns
spousal communications privilege is inapplicable when communications are not confidential

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Becker, Dwyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.