Court of Appeals of Washington· 9/14/2007
State v. McKee
Citations
- 167 P.3d 575
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A]n offender’s constitutional rights during community placement are subject to SRA- authorized infringements, including crime-related prohibitions.”
- “[A]n offender’s constitutional rights during community placement are subject to SRA-authorized infringements, including crime-related prohibitions.”
- “[A]n offender’s constitutional rights during community 22 No. 38697-0-III In re Pers. Restraint of Huezo placement are subject to SRA-authorized infringements, including crime-related prohibitions.”
- condition prohibiting purchase and possession of alcohol was invalid when alcohol did not play a role in the crime
- exceptional concurrent sentencing found unjustified by the facts, but court did not question the multiple offense policy as a basis in a proper case
- spousal communications privilege is inapplicable when communications are not confidential
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Washington v. Christopher Michael Tasker, IICourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-04-28· cited 18×
- State v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-08-05· cited 18×
- Department of Corrections v. Jeffrey R. McKeeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2017-07-11· cited 6×
- State of Washington v. Salvador S. NavaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-10-22
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court· 1992-05-21· cited 1,796×
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court· 2004-01-29· cited 973×
- City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court· 1990-08-23· cited 388×
- United States v. Ray Donald LoyThird Circuit· 2001-01-04· cited 254×
- State v. JoyWashington Supreme Court· 1993-04-29· cited 164×
- State v. SansoneCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-05-23· cited 65×
- In Re MattesonWashington Supreme Court· 2008-07-03· cited 59×
- In re the Personal Restraint of MattesonWashington Supreme Court· 2000-11-02· cited 59×
- State v. FowlerWashington Supreme Court· 2002-01-17· cited 50×
- State v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-03-05· cited 29×
- State v. McKeeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-07-23· cited 28×
- State v. HortmanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-12-30· cited 22×
- State v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-01-29· cited 15×
- Swearingen v. VikWashington Supreme Court· 1958-03-07· cited 14×
- State v. BahlCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-02-26· cited 14×
- State v. AlsupCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-07-25· cited 13×
- State v. GoforthCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1982-12-15· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.