State v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the state is required to establish that the stop- ping officer had both subjective and objective reasonable suspicion before making an investigatory stop
• noting that the state is required to establish that the stopping officer had both subjective and objective reasonable suspicion before making an investigatory stop

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Layton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-11-13· cited 1×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-03-08· cited 428×
• State v. Maciel-Figueroa
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2017-03-02· cited 137×
• State v. Fair
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-05-31· cited 88×
• State v. Illig-Renn
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-08-24· cited 44×
• State v. Kreis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2019-11-07· cited 22×
• State v. Alvarado
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-07-24· cited 21×
• State v. Frias
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-06-10· cited 17×
• State v. Walker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-04-13· cited 17×
• State v. Colpo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-08-05· cited 17×
• State v. Spears
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-11-12· cited 15×
• State v. Gibson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-01-07· cited 13×
• State v. Browning
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-02· cited 10×
• State v. Westcott
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-30· cited 7×
• State v. Ruiz
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-21· cited 2×
• State v. Chittenden
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-07-15· cited 1×