Nebraska Supreme Court· 11/20/1992
State v. Garza
Citations
- 492 N.W.2d 32
- 241 Neb. 934
- 1992 Neb. LEXIS 327
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting Sixth Amendment and equal protection challenges because excluding non-English speakers from juries “promotes the interests of the state’s judicial process by assuring that jurors can understand the proceedings”
- rejecting Sixth Amendment and equal protection challenges because excluding non-English speakers from juries \promotes the interests of the state's judicial process by assuring that jurors can understand the proceedings\
- State may properly exclude aliens from jury service
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hastings, Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, Fahrnbruch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court· 2002-01-11· cited 379×
- State v. BallNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-03-03· cited 154×
- State v. MataNebraska Supreme Court· 2003-09-05· cited 121×
- State v. MantichNebraska Supreme Court· 1996-02-09· cited 102×
- State v. MyersNebraska Supreme Court· 1994-01-14· cited 97×
- State v. McCrackenNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-08-18· cited 87×
- State v. SandersNebraska Supreme Court· 2005-05-27· cited 72×
- State v. GarzaNebraska Supreme Court· 2016-12-30· cited 69×
- In Re Interest of Tyler F.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2008-09-05· cited 55×
- State v. HernandezNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-12-18· cited 52×
- State v. PutzNebraska Supreme Court· 2003-06-06· cited 43×
- State v. VeimanNebraska Supreme Court· 1996-04-19· cited 34×
- State v. McHenryNebraska Supreme Court· 1995-01-06· cited 31×
- State v. HaugenOregon Supreme Court· 2010-11-04· cited 30×
- State v. LerouxNebraska Court of Appeals· 2018-07-10· cited 30×
- State v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court· 1993-03-12· cited 13×
- State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court· 1993-01-29· cited 7×
- State v. ButlerNebraska Court of Appeals· 2001-09-11· cited 6×
- State v. GatsonNebraska Supreme Court· 1993-09-24· cited 6×
- State v. MarshCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-06-19· cited 6×
Cites
63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 2,373×
- Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court· 1983-06-23· cited 1,351×
- Cage v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1990-11-13· cited 1,172×
- Minnick v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1990-12-03· cited 848×
- Ambach v. NorwickSupreme Court· 1979-04-17· cited 255×
- Foley v. ConnelieSupreme Court· 1978-03-22· cited 251×
- State v. TillmanUtah Supreme Court· 1987-12-22· cited 213×
- Bernal v. FainterSupreme Court· 1984-05-30· cited 169×
- United States v. Eduardo Jaime RoucoEleventh Circuit· 1985-07-15· cited 131×
- Cabell v. Chavez-SalidoSupreme Court· 1982-01-12· cited 117×
- State v. MorleyNebraska Supreme Court· 1991-09-20· cited 113×
- United States v. Ronald Cecil, United States of America v. Patrick Haddix, United States of America v. Odus HayesFourth Circuit· 1988-02-05· cited 107×
- Armando A. Miranda v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 1958-04-30· cited 101×
- State v. UtterbackNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-07-02· cited 86×
- Harmon Cable Communications of Nebraska Ltd. Partnership v. Scope Cable Television, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1991-04-19· cited 84×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.