Skip to main content
· 4/19/1991

Harmon Cable Communications of Nebraska Ltd. Partnership v. Scope Cable Television, Inc.

Citations

  • 468 N.W.2d 350
  • 237 Neb. 871
  • 15 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 982
  • 1991 Neb. LEXIS 165

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • agreeing that the interest on balance rule should be applied where \the claims arose from the same transaction\
  • defining a promise as “a manifestation of intention to act or refrain from acting in a specified way, so made as to justify a promisee in understanding that a commitment has been made.” (quoting Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 2(1))
  • trial court given discretion in determining whether sufficient basis provided for lay witness’ opinion testimony
  • no correctable clerical error where jury misunderstood the instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hastings, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, Fahrnbruch, Colwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.