Nebraska Supreme Court· 5/27/2005
State v. Sanders
Citations
- 269 Neb. 895
- 697 N.W.2d 657
- 2005 Neb. LEXIS 103
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing facial challenge as asserting no valid application of statute exists because statute is unconstitutional on its face
- addressing defendant’s argument as a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence despite fact that assignment of error related solely to failure to direct a verdict in defendant’s favor
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hendry, Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, Stephan, McCormack, Miller-Lerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MolinaNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-05-05· cited 226×
- Hamit v. HamitNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-06-02· cited 138×
- State v. IromuanyaNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-08-11· cited 131×
- State v. AldacoNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-03-03· cited 99×
- State v. KuehnNebraska Supreme Court· 2007-03-16· cited 74×
- State v. ClarkNebraska Supreme Court· 2024-01-19· cited 58×
- State v. DavlinNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-08-04· cited 50×
- State v. MasonNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-02-03· cited 49×
- State v. DominguezNebraska Supreme Court· 2015-03-27· cited 41×
- State v. StarkNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-07-28· cited 34×
- State v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court· 2008-11-21· cited 27×
- Wilkins v. BergstromNebraska Court of Appeals· 2009-05-19· cited 24×
- State v. StoneNebraska Supreme Court· 2017-10-13· cited 22×
- State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court· 2017-03-03· cited 18×
- State v. ArmagostNebraska Supreme Court· 2015-06-19· cited 15×
- State v. BranchNebraska Supreme Court· 2009-05-08· cited 13×
- State v. GrosshansNebraska Supreme Court· 2005-12-02· cited 10×
- State v. Interiano AlvaradoNebraska Court of Appeals· 2019-06-11· cited 7×
- State v. PradoNebraska Court of Appeals· 2021-10-12· cited 6×
- In re Interest of K.M.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2018-04-20· cited 4×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 2,373×
- State v. BuckmanNebraska Supreme Court· 2004-03-05· cited 274×
- State v. GartnerNebraska Supreme Court· 2002-02-08· cited 146×
- State v. CienfuegosWashington Supreme Court· 2001-07-05· cited 126×
- State v. VanNebraska Supreme Court· 2004-11-12· cited 89×
- State v. BanesNebraska Supreme Court· 2004-11-12· cited 80×
- State v. RossbachNebraska Supreme Court· 2002-08-16· cited 76×
- State v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-12-17· cited 52×
- State v. MowellNebraska Supreme Court· 2003-12-12· cited 32×
- State v. GarzaNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-11-20· cited 28×
- State v. HynekNebraska Supreme Court· 2002-03-01· cited 25×
- State v. WisinskiNebraska Supreme Court· 2004-11-05· cited 19×
- State v. GutierrezNebraska Supreme Court· 1971-10-29· cited 12×
- State v. HaltomNebraska Supreme Court· 2002-11-22· cited 10×
- People v. CurrieCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-02-26· cited 8×
- State v. Al-SayaghNebraska Supreme Court· 2004-12-10· cited 7×
- State v. VanAckerenNebraska Supreme Court· 2002-02-15· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.