Skip to main content

State v. Garcia

Citations

  • 664 P.2d 1343
  • 233 Kan. 589
  • 1983 Kan. LEXIS 334

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant’s constitutional and statutory right to be present includes the right to be present whenever the court communicates with the jury
  • collecting state court cases and holding that “the information obtained from the appellant to complete the personal history sheet following his request for counsel did not violate his rights against self-incrimination and right to counsel under Miranda.”
  • a defendant’s constitutional and statutory right to be present includes the right to be present “whenever the court communicates with the jury”
  • a defendant’s constitutional and statutory right to be present includes the right to be present “whenever the court communicates with the jury”
  • videotape of examination conducted two months after commission of crime
  • questions asked to complete booking not covered by Miranda

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.