Supreme Court of Kansas· 12/10/1993
State v. Ferguson
Citations
- 864 P.2d 693
- 254 Kan. 62
- 1993 Kan. LEXIS 175
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding substitution of counsel futile because of petitioner’s distrust of all state funded attorneys
- lack of cooperation and communication between defendant and counsel does not itself constitute violation of Sixth Amendment right to counsel
- lack of cooperation and communication between defendant and counsel does not itself constitute violation of Sixth Amendment right to counsel
- lack of cooperation and communication between defendant and counsel does not itself constitute violation of Sixth Amendment right to counsel
- \[L]ack of cooperation or communication between defendant and trial counsel does not in and of itself constitute a violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allegrucci
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MarshallSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-12-18· cited 417×
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas· 1997-01-24· cited 75×
- State v. BurnettSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-07-25· cited 75×
- State v. BryantSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-03-28· cited 70×
- State v. SappingtonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-11-02· cited 49×
- State v. JasperSupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-07-14· cited 48×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1994-05-27· cited 47×
- State v. SpeedSupreme Court of Kansas· 1998-05-29· cited 44×
- State v. WellsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-06-28· cited 40×
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-04-20· cited 38×
- State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1994-10-28· cited 36×
- State v. CollierSupreme Court of Kansas· 1996-03-08· cited 30×
- State v. HegwoodSupreme Court of Kansas· 1995-01-27· cited 25×
- State v. AbelSupreme Court of Kansas· 1997-01-24· cited 21×
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of Kansas· 2002-04-19· cited 20×
- State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2000-03-03· cited 19×
- State v. NoriegaSupreme Court of Kansas· 1997-01-24· cited 17×
- State v. RicksSupreme Court of Kansas· 1995-04-21· cited 13×
- State v. HighSupreme Court of Kansas· 1996-07-12· cited 11×
- State v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2002-05-03· cited 9×
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- United States v. Ishmael GallopFourth Circuit· 1988-01-28· cited 248×
- Michael Lee Smith v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionEighth Circuit· 1991-01-15· cited 160×
- State v. GrissomSupreme Court of Kansas· 1992-11-10· cited 133×
- United States v. Larry WalkerNinth Circuit· 1990-09-25· cited 96×
- Hoffman v. HaugSupreme Court of Kansas· 1988-03-25· cited 61×
- State v. RueckertSupreme Court of Kansas· 1977-03-05· cited 60×
- State v. MarksSupreme Court of Kansas· 1979-12-01· cited 57×
- State v. WilliamSupreme Court of Kansas· 1991-03-01· cited 56×
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Kansas· 1983-06-10· cited 54×
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1970-04-11· cited 52×
- Massey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1950-02-15· cited 52×
- State v. ChismSupreme Court of Kansas· 1988-07-08· cited 48×
- State v. CruzCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1991-04-19· cited 45×
- State v. NirschlSupreme Court of Kansas· 1971-11-06· cited 43×
- State v. LucasSupreme Court of Kansas· 1988-07-08· cited 37×
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Kansas· 1990-01-19· cited 36×
- State v. PeltierSupreme Court of Kansas· 1991-10-25· cited 36×
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas· 1986-05-02· cited 34×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.