Supreme Court of Kansas· 7/9/1993

State v. Coleman

Citations

856 P.2d 121
253 Kan. 335
1993 Kan. LEXIS 120

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“trial courts consistently permit the late endorsement of State witnesses [and we generally uphold those decisions].”
“It is well established that a party may not assert error based on the erroneous exclusion of evidence in the absence of a proffer of that excluded evidence.”
\It is well established that a party may not assert error based on the erroneous exclusion of evidence in the absence of a proffer of that excluded evidence.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abbott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.