Supreme Court of Minnesota· 8/18/1995
State v. Gaitan
Citations
- 536 N.W.2d 11
- 1995 Minn. LEXIS 687
- 1995 WL 491076
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that prosecutor needs good-faith basis for believing the evidence offered is admissible
- noting whether discriminatory intent exists is essentially factual determination that turns largely on trial court’s evaluation of credibility
- upholding the district court’s finding that the state’s peremptory strike of a juror based on the juror’s reluctance to sit in judgment was not a pretext for racial discrimination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Keith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. CarridineSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-05-09· cited 103×
- People v. RichieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-12-18· cited 102×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-09-07· cited 87×
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-01-11· cited 73×
- State v. PilotSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-06-03· cited 72×
- State v. GreenleafSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-04-15· cited 70×
- State v. ReinersSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-07-10· cited 52×
- State v. GomezSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-09-28· cited 50×
- Angus v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-04-28· cited 43×
- State v. BuggsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-07-16· cited 42×
- State v. DeVerneySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-04-15· cited 40×
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-08-06· cited 38×
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-06-07· cited 34×
- State v. WebsterSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-12-05· cited 28×
- State v. DigginsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-08-28· cited 18×
- State v. BerriosCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-08-24· cited 17×
- State v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-04-15· cited 17×
- State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-09-29· cited 11×
- State v. SpearsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-03-18· cited 9×
- Forrest v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2003-10-14· cited 7×
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 4,168×
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court· 1989-05-01· cited 3,836×
- Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court· 1995-05-15· cited 3,008×
- JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court· 1994-04-19· cited 1,335×
- Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court· 1988-11-14· cited 1,183×
- McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Supreme Court· 1995-01-23· cited 967×
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-03-31· cited 305×
- United States v. Mario Biaggi, Stanley Simon, Richard Biaggi, Peter Neglia, John Mariotta, and Bernard EhrlichSecond Circuit· 1990-06-29· cited 162×
- State v. SalitrosSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-05-14· cited 119×
- State v. PorterSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-01-13· cited 97×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-12-23· cited 97×
- United States v. JohnsonEighth Circuit· 1994-07-11· cited 91×
- United States v. James Tunnessen, Douglas Fullerton, and Michael Robert Reape, DefendantsSecond Circuit· 1985-05-24· cited 79×
- State v. HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-11-06· cited 79×
- United States v. Humberto Hinojosa and Carlos LermaFifth Circuit· 1992-04-03· cited 70×
- State v. McRaeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-12-24· cited 65×
- Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1995-01-09· cited 53×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-08-27· cited 52×
- State v. KraushaarSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-05-24· cited 35×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.