United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Thomas Mickens, Anthony Jacobs, Shelby Kearney, Bettina Jacobs Celifie, Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that 91 “[t]he district court’s occasional intemperate remarks did not substantially taint [the defendants’] 92 trial” and “any possible prejudice to [the defendant] was cured by the court’s cautionary 93 instruction”
• “[T]he standards for admission of Rule 404(b) evidence were satisfied. The testimony . . . was not offered to prove Mickens’ bad character or criminal propensity, but rather to prove his consciousness of guilt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).