· 7/13/1989
State v. Shove
Citations
- 776 P.2d 132
- 113 Wash. 2d 83
- 1989 Wash. LEXIS 86
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the court lacked authority to modify a work release sentence to a suspended sentence with probation
- holding that the court lacked authority to modify a work release sentence to a suspended sentence with probation
- sentencing court lacks authority under the SRA to reduce a standard range sentence after it has been imposed
- “Modification of a judgment is not appropriate merely because it appears, wholly in retrospect, that a different decision might have been preferable.”
- “Final judgments in both criminal and civil cases may be vacated or altered only in those limited circumstances where the interests of justice most urgently require.”
- “Final judgments in both criminal and civil cases may be vacated or altered only in those limited circumstances where the interests of justice most urgently require.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Durham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.