Washington Supreme Court· 1/26/1995

State v. Alexander

Citations

888 P.2d 1169
125 Wash. 2d 717
1995 Wash. LEXIS 56

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the legislature did not establish a minimum amount for which a defendant could be prosecuted in determining whether an \extraordinarily small amount\ could be the basis of an exceptional reduced sentence
approving extraordinary small amount of controlled substance and low level of sophistication as mitigators
failing to provide verbatim report of proceedings was a failure to “properly contest” certain findings of fact
approving extraordinary small amount of controlled substance and low level of sophistication as mitigators
rejecting peripheral participation in a drug business as a mitigating factor
an unchallenged factual finding in connection with sentencing is treated as a verity on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Utter, Andersen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.