Court of Appeals of Kansas· 4/13/2001

State v. Fulton

Citations

23 P.3d 167
28 Kan. App. 2d 815
2001 Kan. App. LEXIS 285

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“A continuous incident where a victim is alleged to have been cut more than once by the defendant is not a multiple acts situation requiring a unanimity instruction.”
“Duplicity is the joining in a single count of a complaint two or more distinct and separate offenses.”
one continuous incident rather than multiple acts where the defendant cut the victim on the face and then cut him on his chest because it would have been multiplicitous to charge each cutting separately
one continuous incident rather than multiple acts where defendant was cut on face and then on chest because it would have been multiplicitous to charge each cutting separately

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Plerron, Rulon, Pierron, Rogg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.